$221 Million! What Clinton + Obama Spent!

How much have the candidates raised?  How much have they spent?  Take a look.  (NY Times graphic here).

People in other countries find this morbidly fascinating. 

I get asked a lot:  "Why do American elections cost so much?"  How do you explain the spiraling blackmail effect of crescendoing candidates' televison ads requiring competing ads by the others?  How to explain that apparently in the U.S., s(he) who spends more on ads has a better chance to win?  Money is survival, yet openly viewable, not necessarily so elsewhere in the world.

Could a poor woman/man get to be U.S. President?  Not really.  Could this happen in other countries?  Maybe in those countries where might makes Presidents. 

With the Internet changing everything, perhaps.  Imagine a candidate who didn't have millions, running for U.S. President.  Could happen in the future; for now, it would be tough.  What if Hillary didn't have that five million dollars she "lent" her own campaign?  How do candidates pay for all that travel, housing on the road, mortgages while they're absent from work, child care?  Michelle Obama has family to watch her children; what would parents without familial child-carers do?

It costs to run for public office in America.  What about campaign spending limits?  McCain has things to clear up first before learning what he can accept; Obama wrote a column on spending limits, please see Red Hot!

Carole

Comments

Well, I guess that

Well, I guess that candidates would simply spend "invisibly" if you put down spending limits, and I'm guessing that reactionary forces would have great experience in moving money silently like that. So I wonder if spending limits would really benefit less wealthy candidates. // Besides, it seems to be a sad fact that even with the internet around, it's money that makes the media move, and it's the media that move the masses. In general, money brings with it - and is a reflection of - power. That doesn't make it evil, in my opinion. It's a simple and timeless fact. I'd much prefer to perfect a strategy of countless-if-smaller grassroots donations to challenge big-donor competition on the reactionary side. // P.S.: In countries with parliamentary democracies there is seldom so much time to prepare for an election, which automatically reduces the insanity of it all. Look at Canada, for example. So let's just change our system, how's that for a more radical idea? It would even allow minority parties like the Greens to actively participate in government. - Antje in Vienna

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.